Pages

Statement of the Problem

Knowledge is at once the simplest and the profoundest of human experiences.

 

Nothing seems more plain to the ordinary man, and more beyond the possibility of any doubt, than the everyday facts if his knowledge. He is utterly convinced of the truth and certainty of the happenings in and around him. It never enters his mind to question the validity of his convictions concerning the knowledge of his experience. We may imagine him sitting in his lounging chair before a window and communing with his thoughts:

 

"It is certainly pleasant to sit here in comfort and watch the world go by. People are hurrying home from their business, chatting noisily with one another as they walk along the street. The sun appears flatter, larger, and redder every minute, as it slowly sinks in the west, and little by little the blue of the sky seems to turn into fire and gold. Soon the darkness will be here, and I shall see the distant stars. I did not think the wind was so very strong, but I see that it broke a branch from the tree in the square opposite. It is much colder than it was yesterday; I believe that will cause a frost tonight. The air is very raw outside. I ought not to have gone without a topcoat this morning. I believe I have caught a cold; I felt miserable all afternoon, I had a headache, the old pipe didn’t taste, and my mind was so foggy that I couldn't control my thoughts properly, and I made a number of errors. I am not myself now. I must see my physician tomorrow; he knows my body almost as well as I know my soul."

 

All this seems so simple and matter-of-fact, and the knowledge contained in these statements seems so obvious and transparent, that we should scarcely consider it worthy of second thought. Much less should we think that philosophers could discover any deep and mysterious problems hidden in the desultory musings of an old gentleman seeking comfort in his easy-chair. Such, however, is precisely the case.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Most Reading

Sidebar One

The validity or truth-value of human knowledge is the crucial problem in modern Philosophy. It has agitated the minds of philosophers for more than three centuries and the effects of their discussions are felt in every department of science. Naturally so, since it lies in the very nature of Epistemology to question the capability of man's mind to contact reality and to know what things are in themselves, the validity of all knowledge, and consequently also of science, is at stake. The foundations of human knowledge are challenged, examined, and frequently attacked. An acquaintance with this problem and its possible solution will be, therefore, a matter of prime importance for every seeker of truth and for every student of Philosophy.

 

This blog is intended for those who have no previous acquaintance with the subject. In accordance with this purpose, we have endeavored to place the problem in its proper historical setting, showing its origin and development, without confusing the issue with a large amount of historical detail. For the same reason, the subject (Epistemology) is treated in a constructive manner, seeking a positive solution of the Epistemological problem rather than giving an extensive criticism and refutation of the individual opposing systems of thought.

 

The language, so far as consistent with the matter under discussion, is plain and simple, avoiding what Hugh S. Elliot styles "sesquipedalian verbiage." Much of our modern philosophical jargon is so well-nigh incomprehensible as to make the underlying ideas opaque unintelligibility is not necessarily depth. Obscurities, of course, remain because the nature of knowledge itself is obscure; no amount of words will ever be able to clarify completely the mystery of the mind.