Pages

Classes of Truth: The Mediate Judgments as Results of Inductive Process

The fourth class of truths is contained in mediate judgments which are the result of an inductive process generalizing the individual, concrete data of direct sense-perception into laws of a universal character.

 

The generalizations and laws of experimental science are of this type. After careful investigation and extensive experimentation the intellect perceives the essential elements in a series of repeated phenomena and occurrences and then expresses the true cause in a definite judgment or law.

 

It is not necessary for science to investigate every single case of the past and present; that, in fact, would be impossible. Since I have arrived at knowledge of the essential elements of the phenomenon in question, the law which the intellect has formulated has a universal and necessary value and applies with equal force to each and every phenomenon of that class.

 

An instance will make this clear. It was noticed that the boiling point of water is always +212 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level. Taking this as a starting point, scientists made a great number of experiments of boiling water at seal level, and the result was in each case the same: water boiled at +212 degrees Fahrenheit.

 

Thus the law was formulated by means of a generalization: 'The boiling point of water is +212 degree Fahrenheit at sea level.' This being an essential characteristic of water, it was not necessary to take every drop of water on the globe to sea level and boil it; scientists know that it will boil, because such is the nature of water.

 

Every such law is a mediate judgment which expresses a necessary and universal truth, based upon the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Principle of Causality.

 

 

Coming up next on Epistemology Today blog: 

The Epistemological Problem

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Most Reading

Sidebar One

The validity or truth-value of human knowledge is the crucial problem in modern Philosophy. It has agitated the minds of philosophers for more than three centuries and the effects of their discussions are felt in every department of science. Naturally so, since it lies in the very nature of Epistemology to question the capability of man's mind to contact reality and to know what things are in themselves, the validity of all knowledge, and consequently also of science, is at stake. The foundations of human knowledge are challenged, examined, and frequently attacked. An acquaintance with this problem and its possible solution will be, therefore, a matter of prime importance for every seeker of truth and for every student of Philosophy.

 

This blog is intended for those who have no previous acquaintance with the subject. In accordance with this purpose, we have endeavored to place the problem in its proper historical setting, showing its origin and development, without confusing the issue with a large amount of historical detail. For the same reason, the subject (Epistemology) is treated in a constructive manner, seeking a positive solution of the Epistemological problem rather than giving an extensive criticism and refutation of the individual opposing systems of thought.

 

The language, so far as consistent with the matter under discussion, is plain and simple, avoiding what Hugh S. Elliot styles "sesquipedalian verbiage." Much of our modern philosophical jargon is so well-nigh incomprehensible as to make the underlying ideas opaque unintelligibility is not necessarily depth. Obscurities, of course, remain because the nature of knowledge itself is obscure; no amount of words will ever be able to clarify completely the mystery of the mind.