Pages

Epistemology: The Certitude and the Truth

Certitude is the state of the mind in which it gives a firm assent to a judgment without fear of the possibility of error due to recognized valid reasons.

 

Three elements, therefore, enter into the concept of certitude: the firm assent to the judgment, the absence of fear of possible error, and the understanding of the valid reasons which exclude this fear.

 

The absence of the fear of possible error is the negative factor which distinguishes certitude from doubt and opinion, while the consciously apprehend valid reasons for the firm assent of the mind are the positive factor of conviction or certitude. This, of course, does not mean that the mind is really infallible in these convictions and that error is impossible in all these judgments.

 

What it does mean, though, is that the mind is subjectively certain of its grounds and does not fear the possibility of error; it is convinced that it is in possession of knowledge which is true and valid.

 

The educated man and the savage alike are convinced that the sun is an existing reality in the sky. The savage, furthermore, is convinced that the sun actually travels through the sky from east to west in the course of the day, while the educated man is certain that it does not; one of these two (subjective) certitudes must be wrong, because they are contradictory and mutually exclusive and cannot be true at the same time.

 

While, then, subjective certitude does not exclude the possibility of error, it does always exclude the fear of error in the mind of him who possesses certitude.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Most Reading

Sidebar One

The validity or truth-value of human knowledge is the crucial problem in modern Philosophy. It has agitated the minds of philosophers for more than three centuries and the effects of their discussions are felt in every department of science. Naturally so, since it lies in the very nature of Epistemology to question the capability of man's mind to contact reality and to know what things are in themselves, the validity of all knowledge, and consequently also of science, is at stake. The foundations of human knowledge are challenged, examined, and frequently attacked. An acquaintance with this problem and its possible solution will be, therefore, a matter of prime importance for every seeker of truth and for every student of Philosophy.

 

This blog is intended for those who have no previous acquaintance with the subject. In accordance with this purpose, we have endeavored to place the problem in its proper historical setting, showing its origin and development, without confusing the issue with a large amount of historical detail. For the same reason, the subject (Epistemology) is treated in a constructive manner, seeking a positive solution of the Epistemological problem rather than giving an extensive criticism and refutation of the individual opposing systems of thought.

 

The language, so far as consistent with the matter under discussion, is plain and simple, avoiding what Hugh S. Elliot styles "sesquipedalian verbiage." Much of our modern philosophical jargon is so well-nigh incomprehensible as to make the underlying ideas opaque unintelligibility is not necessarily depth. Obscurities, of course, remain because the nature of knowledge itself is obscure; no amount of words will ever be able to clarify completely the mystery of the mind.