Pages

Specification of the Problem in Epistemology

The first requisite for a rational solution of the problem of knowledge is a clear understanding of the ideas and terms which underlie the problem as a whole. The previous posts made us acquainted with these basic ideas and terms. The next requisite will be an exposition of the general facts which are given and granted by all, which form the common ground upon which all stand, which constitute the undisputed basis of the problem, and which are the universal starting point of all inquiry.

 

Knowledge we have. No one seriously doubts that we possess what is termed 'knowledge,' considered as a subjective state of the mind. What worries the philosophers is the firm and spontaneous conviction entertained by the generality of men, educated and uneducated alike, that this knowledge is a faithful representation of reality as it is in itself. They are not so sure that the ordinary man's claim to truth in this knowledge is justifiable beyond reasonable doubt. They feel that these spontaneous convictions must be critically investigated before their validity can be admitted. These convictions are obvious facts. We have them, and they cannot be argued out of existence. That they produce in us a subjective certitude, is also admitted as a fact; but what philosophers desire to establish is, whether this subjective certitude is grounded on objective reality. That is the vital question. It will be necessary, therefore, to make a general survey of these spontaneous convictions of mankind, considered solely as facts, in order to obtain a clearer conception of the problem.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Most Reading

Sidebar One

The validity or truth-value of human knowledge is the crucial problem in modern Philosophy. It has agitated the minds of philosophers for more than three centuries and the effects of their discussions are felt in every department of science. Naturally so, since it lies in the very nature of Epistemology to question the capability of man's mind to contact reality and to know what things are in themselves, the validity of all knowledge, and consequently also of science, is at stake. The foundations of human knowledge are challenged, examined, and frequently attacked. An acquaintance with this problem and its possible solution will be, therefore, a matter of prime importance for every seeker of truth and for every student of Philosophy.

 

This blog is intended for those who have no previous acquaintance with the subject. In accordance with this purpose, we have endeavored to place the problem in its proper historical setting, showing its origin and development, without confusing the issue with a large amount of historical detail. For the same reason, the subject (Epistemology) is treated in a constructive manner, seeking a positive solution of the Epistemological problem rather than giving an extensive criticism and refutation of the individual opposing systems of thought.

 

The language, so far as consistent with the matter under discussion, is plain and simple, avoiding what Hugh S. Elliot styles "sesquipedalian verbiage." Much of our modern philosophical jargon is so well-nigh incomprehensible as to make the underlying ideas opaque unintelligibility is not necessarily depth. Obscurities, of course, remain because the nature of knowledge itself is obscure; no amount of words will ever be able to clarify completely the mystery of the mind.